Ideological Convergence’s and Conflicts: A Comparative Analysis of Gandhi and Ambedkar

International Journal of Social Science Research (IJSSR)

International Journal of Social Science Research (IJSSR)

An Open Access, Peer-reviewed, Bi-Monthly Journal

ISSN: 3048-9490

Call For Paper - Volume - 2 Issue - 5 (September - October 2025)
Article Title

Ideological Convergence’s and Conflicts: A Comparative Analysis of Gandhi and Ambedkar

Author(s) Fatima Begum, Pompee Dehingia.
Country India
Abstract

This paper explores the ideological convergences and conflicts between Mahatma Gandhi and Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, two towering figures in India’s socio-political and intellectual history. Though Both were committed to the upliftment of the oppressed, especially the Dalit’s, their visions for Achieving social justice and national development diverged significantly. Gandhi emphasized Moral reform, non-violence, and the transformation of hearts and minds within the framework of Tradition, while Ambedkar championed structural change, legal rights, and the annihilation of Caste through rational and constitutional means. The paper conducts a comparative analysis of their philosophies on key issues such as caste, Religion, democracy, and social reform, drawing from their major writings, speeches, and political Actions—particularly the Poona Pact of 1932 and the Constituent Assembly debates. While Identifying moments of ideological convergence, the study also highlights profound and Enduring conflicts that reveal contrasting visions of India’s future. Ultimately, the paper argues that understanding the Gandhi–Ambedkar dialogue is essential for Grasping the foundations of modern Indian democracy and the continuing struggles over Equality, identity, and justice in contemporary India.

Area Political Science
Issue Volume 2, Issue 5, September 2025
Published 27-09-2025
How to Cite Begum, F., & Dehingia, P. (2025). Ideological Convergence’s and Conflicts: A Comparative Analysis of Gandhi and Ambedkar. International Journal of Social Science Research (IJSSR), 2(5), 173-182, DOI: https://doi.org/10.70558/IJSSR.2025.v2.i5.30611.
DOI 10.70558/IJSSR.2025.v2.i5.30611

PDF View / Download PDF File