International Journal of Social Science Research (IJSSR)

A Theoretical Analysis of Sudanese Humanitarian Crisis

The Sudanese conflict is a complex concoction of power struggles, ethnic tensions, and international apathy. The incumbent instability in Sudan is examined in this study, which also makes comparisons to other humanitarian catastrophes like the genocide in Rwanda. It emphasizes how global powers' resource exploitation, autocratic military domination, and proxy interventions have eclipsed humanitarian aid, resulting in widespread starvation, destruction of infrastructure, and mass displacement. Weapons still plunge into the uncontrolled networks, escalating violence, particularly in Darfur, in spite of levied arms embargoes. This research delves into the inability of international organizations to effectively coordinate humanitarian aid and enforce resolutions. Furthermore, it highlights the necessity of decentralization, inclusive governance, and constitutional reform. A sustainable peace process headed by unbiased regional actors and guaranteeing participation from women, civil society, and marginalized groups is necessary for a lasting solution. Internal conflicts and exuberant interests have made the Sudanese situation more trivial to settle militarily. Rather, the future of Sudan depends on reestablishing federal institutions, empowering its people to undo past injustices, and restoring democratic principles. The study calls for swift, coordinated action to restrain the region from devolving further into anarchy and to set foot into long-standing peace.